Selected IKI impacts from 2015 to 2024
In the reporting period 2015 to 2023, IKI projects stated the following …
directly supported through networking and training.
Data from Standard Indicator ‘SI 4 - Capacity People’.
private capital catalysed.
Data from Standard Indicator ‘SI 5 - Leveraged Finance’.
CO2 equivalents directly or indirectly mitigated.
Data from Standard Indicators ‘Action Mitigation’ and ‘SI 1 - Mitigation’.
directly or indirectly supported by the project to adapt to climate change and/or to conserve ecosystems.
Data from Standard Indicators ‘Action People’ and ‘SI 3 - Adaptation’.
private capital mobilised.
Data from Standard Indicator ‘SI 5 - Leveraged Finance’.
better protection and conservation of ecosystems.
Data from Standard Indicators ‘Action Ecosystems’ and 'SI 2 - Ecosystems'.
Data
The current analysis was based on all IKI projects that provided plausible actual values for the SIs in the reporting period from 2015 to 2024. This includes not only completed projects, but also projects that are still in the implementation phase.
Not all projects report on the SIs. Those that don’t report on them include projects that have been running for some time or that started before the introduction of SIs in 2015 and have already been completed in the meantime, as well as some trust funds without binding agreements on SI reporting.
The IKI is currently in a transitional phase and is working to close these gaps so that it can report on its cross-programme impacts on the basis of an ever broader and better database. A general improvement in data quality can already be observed.
A note on data and comparisons with previous analyses
In isolated cases, the figures for the SIs may also be lower compared to previous analyses. The reasons for this are as follows: the IKI checks the plausibility of the data based on the annual interim reports. If a project adapts its explanatory notes indicating irregularities in the data compared to older reports, a request for clarification is submitted for this data. If these ambiguities cannot be cleared up with the implementing organisation, then the data is not included in the analysis. In some cases, projects also adjust their reported data upwards or downwards themselves.
The link has been copied to the clipboard